What can we compare about Cyprus and Poland?
This page brings together the measures that can currently be sourced for both countries. 3 of 11 planned dimensions have evidence behind them today; the rest remain visible with their coverage limits.
A comparison is useful when we can name what was measured and what remains unknown.
Read each dimension on its own
Compare the sourced figures for each dimension. They describe different things, and no overall similarity score is published. Unavailable dimensions show where evidence is missing.
Countries
| Cyprus | Poland | |
|---|---|---|
| ISO 3166-1 alpha-3 | CYP | POL |
| ISO 3166-1 alpha-2 | CY | PL |
| UN M49 code | 196 | 616 |
| UN official name | Cyprus | Poland |
Identity codes from ISO 3166-1, verified against the UN Statistics Division M49 list. See the source registry.
Trust in other people (average rating)
Cyprus
3.5of 10 · 2025
7 years available: 2013 4.5 · 2018 2.1 · 2021 3.3 · 2022 3.6 · 2023 3.5 · 2024 3.7 · 2025 3.5
Poland
6.9of 10 · 2025
7 years available: 2013 6.0 · 2018 6.3 · 2021 6.9 · 2022 6.9 · 2023 6.9 · 2024 7.0 · 2025 6.9
What is measured. Mean of self-reported answers, on a scale from 0 ("you do not trust any other person") to 10 ("most people can be trusted"), among survey respondents aged 16 and over. Collected through the well-being variables of EU-SILC and published by Eurostat as table ilc_pw03.
How to read it. A country average of a subjective self-report. It says nothing about any individual, and it is not a measure of how trustworthy people in a country are — only of what respondents said. Cross-country comparison of 0-10 scale questions is affected by differences in response style, so small gaps between countries should not be read as real differences.
Source: Eurostat (Statistical Office of the European Union), Trust in others by sex, age and educational attainment (EU-SILC). Instrument: EU-SILC well-being variables, generalised trust item. Eurostat does not publish the sample size on this table; see the EU-SILC methodology for the survey design.
The gap between these two figures is 3.4 points on a 0–10 scale. It is deliberately not converted into a similarity percentage: no normalization has been agreed, and one indicator is not a similarity measure.
Migration relationship with Cyprus
People enumerated in Cyprus at the 2021 Census, 1 October 2021. These are two different measures of a connection, not one — a person can appear in either, both, or neither.
| Measure | People in Cyprus | Share of the population |
|---|---|---|
| Holding Poland citizenship | 2,379 | 0.26%* |
| Born in Poland | 2,422 | 0.26%* |
Citizenship describes a person’s legal nationality. It is not ethnicity, ancestry or birthplace; country of birth is listed separately because the two measures are different.
Humanity Observatory holds no data on people from Cyprus living in Poland; that would come from Poland’s own statistical office or from a bilateral source, neither of which has been ingested.
Geographic proximity
2,133 km
Great-circle distance between capital cities (Nicosia and Warsaw), WGS84 sphere.
Country profile
No profile statements have been published for Poland. The data model that will carry them is built and enforces the distinction between a fact (needs a source), an observation (needs a real measurement) and an interpretation (needs a named author and a source) — but no statements have been written, and none will be generated.
Coverage
Every dimension the eventual index is specified to use, and whether it has data behind it for this pair.
| Dimension | Status | What it would measure |
|---|---|---|
| Language proximity | unavailable | Structural distance between the principal languages of the two countries.No language-distance dataset has been ingested. A candidate exists (ASJP lexical distances) but its reuse terms have not been checked. |
| Religious composition similarity | unavailable | Distributional similarity of self-declared religious affiliation.CYSTAT publishes religion for Cyprus (table 1891632E, national level, self-declared) but it has not been ingested, and no comparable measured series has been ingested for any other country. Religious composition is never inferred from nationality. |
| Social trust | available | Average self-reported trust in other people, on a 0-10 scale, among people aged 16 and over. |
| Family values | unavailable | Survey responses on family obligation and household structure.The candidate sources (EVS, WVS, ESS) all require registration, which would make the ingestion irreproducible from this repository. Not yet resolved. |
| Institutional trust | unavailable | Trust in parliament, the police, the judiciary and the civil service.Eurostat ilc_pw03 carries only the interpersonal-trust domain for Cyprus. The institutional domains are in ESS, which requires registration. |
| Gender attitudes | unavailable | Survey responses on gender roles and gender equality.No source ingested. |
| Work values | unavailable | Survey responses on the importance of work, hierarchy and autonomy.No source ingested. |
| Migration and contact history | available | How many people in Cyprus hold the other country’s citizenship or were born there. |
| Geographic proximity | available | Great-circle distance between the two capitals. |
| Food and cultural traditions | unavailable | Documented shared dishes, ingredients and culinary lineage.No source ingested. Requires a measurable, sourced definition first. |
| Historical links | unavailable | Shared statehood, legal tradition or long-standing institutional ties.Only sourced FACT claims would qualify, and none have been entered for this pair. |